Industry solutions
Law firm website design starts with an accurate account of your practice areas and how people can contact you. Pages explain general procedures rather than advising on an individual case, and are reviewed by the responsible attorney before publication. The publishing workflow records the author, reviewer, and reason for each update. Articles affected by changes in the law are reassessed, while clear categories lead readers to relevant practice-area pages.
Industry-specific modules
Profiles organize qualifications, bar registration, and verifiable professional information. Team changes are tracked across language versions without presenting one attorney as superior to another. Initial inquiries are limited to the topic and preferred consultation arrangements. Case documents are not collected at first contact. A clear notice explains that submitting a form does not mean the firm has accepted the matter, while the submission itself creates a controlled follow-up record for your staff.
Each page describes a service your firm actually provides and the general route for making an inquiry. It explains the process without giving advice on a specific dispute, and is reviewed by the responsible attorney before publication.
The editorial workflow records the author, reviewer, and reason for an update. Articles are reassessed when legislation changes. Categories help readers reach the relevant practice-area page.
Education, bar registration, and verifiable professional activities are organized in each profile. Changes are tracked across all language versions; profile fields do not imply superiority over other attorneys.
The form asks for the subject and meeting preference, not case documents. It explains that an inquiry does not constitute acceptance of the matter and creates a follow-up record for authorized staff.
Notices about data use and retention reflect your firm’s policy and appear at the relevant point in the form. Readers can clearly distinguish general legal information from advice on their own circumstances. For Turkish operations, this includes Turkey’s Personal Data Protection Law (KVKK).
Your firm’s own contact address, consultation arrangements, and directions are managed centrally. Central updates keep phone numbers and hours consistent across pages. The privacy implications of maps are considered separately.
Your firm approves legal terminology in each language. Equivalent pages describe the same practice scope, and an untranslated article is not presented as a translated publication.
Staff, authors, and publishing leads can have different permissions. Draft statuses and change history help prevent accidental publication and make editorial responsibility clear in everyday use.
A law firm’s website is a professional publishing environment, not simply a sales funnel. A description of a practice area is different from legal advice on a particular dispute. Editorial guidance, the reviewing attorney’s name, and the publication decision make that distinction visible in the dashboard. Titles, bar details, academic work, and contact information must be verifiable. Superlatives and promises about case outcomes are excluded from the content plan. Photography, domain names, links, social media sharing, and search snippets also need review under the applicable professional rules.
Software alone does not establish legal compliance. The firm must review current regulations and guidance from its relevant bar or regulator. For Turkish firms, this includes the applicable restrictions on attorney advertising; these are not presented as universal rules for other jurisdictions. Drafts submitted to the responsible attorney are retained with a change record. When a procedure or deadline changes, the affected passage is revised rather than merely refreshing the date. Content makes clear that urgent matters should not be handled by relying on a website article. Client names, case numbers, and identifying details are not repurposed as article examples.
Information architecture begins with visitors’ needs, not the size of your team. An employer seeking contract advice and an individual researching divorce should be able to find their own route through the site. Practice pages separate service scope, general procedures, possible document categories, and contact options. A document list is not definitive legal instruction: the individual matter is assessed during a consultation. Article categories connect to these pages without creating dozens of repetitive answers to the same question.
Authors, reviewing attorneys, and publication managers can have separate dashboard roles. A staff member may update consultation hours without editing legal articles. When an attorney leaves, their profile, article bylines, and language versions are reviewed together. Archived authorship is not automatically reassigned to someone else. Links to legislation can carry source and access-date records, and broken external links form part of editorial maintenance. Custom design combines a clear visual identity with professional responsibility made visible in the publishing system.
We define the consultation journey using a sample inquiry: the visitor selects a topic, provides a contact number, and indicates a suitable meeting time. Free-text fields remain limited; the form does not request identity documents, another party’s personal details, or case files. Submission does not mean the attorney has accepted the matter, an attorney-client relationship has formed, or a legal deadline has been suspended. That distinction appears clearly beside the submit button and in the acknowledgment.
Discovery establishes who receives inquiries, how duplicates are identified, and when records are deleted. Email notifications need not contain the entire message; directing an authorized user to the dashboard may offer better control. Calendar connections expose consultation capacity, not other visitors’ names. Implementation includes mobile keyboards, understandable errors, and keyboard navigation. During migration, old article URLs are mapped to the closest relevant page rather than all being redirected to the homepage. Staff training covers draft review and closing inquiries.
Content responsibility and the condition of an existing archive often have more impact on the budget than page count. A contact-only website is different from migrating years of legal articles. Matching authors, fixing character encoding, reviewing image rights, identifying outdated law, and resolving duplicate URLs require separate work. A multilingual quote is incomplete until terminology approval and responsibility for keeping each language current are agreed.
A client portal is not treated as an extension of a public contact form. Authentication, document permissions, case access, session duration, access logs, and retention need their own scope. Calendar licenses, hosting, domains, and third-party fees are separated from development costs. The proposal specifies source code handover, work under a written contract with invoices, and the scope of one year of technical support after delivery. New modules are distinguished from fixing faults in agreed functionality. Content awaiting attorney review can affect the launch date, so the schedule is not based on coding time alone. Compare proposals by deliverables and responsibilities, not just total pages.
Search visibility in legal services rests on consistent, current information. Titles reflect genuine practice areas; the same article is not duplicated for every city or dispute type. Articles answer particular questions, while practice pages describe the firm’s service scope. Authors, publication dates, substantive updates, and sources help readers assess the content. Crawlable links, meaningful URLs, and appropriate structured data support technical SEO without promising rankings.
If the firm uses case-management software, only the necessary connection is exposed through the public site. Court documents and client information do not belong in search-accessible directories. Integrations depend on authorized provider methods, permissions, and an agreed data scope; we do not build unauthorized automation for official systems. Deadline reminders do not replace the firm’s own controls, and successful notification does not establish that a legal deadline has been managed. Analytics do not receive form text or details of personal matters. Your firm reviews paid promotion against its applicable professional rules. We do not propose campaigns that exceed professional limits.
Portfolio
These websites are live. Visit them to explore the work.
All project referencesFAQs
The firm should check current professional rules and guidance from its bar or regulator. We develop draft review, measured information presentation, and inquiry workflows. We do not describe the website as legally certified or assume Turkish rules apply in another jurisdiction.
We do not treat legal advertising as an ordinary business campaign. Your firm should review its applicable professional rules with its advisers. Rather than proposing campaigns aimed at winning new clients, we focus on making informative content technically accessible.
The responsible attorney controls legal accuracy. An editor can prepare a draft, but publication requires separate authorization. Categories and update records help identify articles needing review after a change in the law.
Using client experiences or case outcomes for promotion can raise confidentiality and advertising concerns. These elements are not included by default. We favor verifiable professional information and publications, with any additional content subject to your firm’s review.
The schedule depends on archive cleanup, attorney review, and dashboard scope. Preserving old URLs or developing a portal adds separate work. We do not commit to a definite launch date before content approval is complete.
Mediation inquiries and requests for a firm consultation can follow separate workflows. A small team may need only a straightforward publishing dashboard. We design around the actual intake process rather than adding an unnecessary client portal. Contact us
Related services
Websites that organize product information, company credentials, and inquiries for the right team.
View detailsAccessible, measurable web interfaces shaped around the content people need.
View detailsSEO that considers crawling, search intent, and conversion data together.
View detailsCRM, ERP, SaaS, and distributor portals built around your business rules.
View detailsGet a quote
Let's clarify your needs
